Sign in
Boeing Posts $428M Q2 Loss on $280M Air Force One Charge; Stock Up 4.9% on Positive Free Cash Flow, Record $715B Backlog
  • Boeing reported a Q2 GAAP loss of $428M (–$0.67/share) and a core loss of $0.76/share — more than double the $0.30 loss analysts expected — on revenue of $24.56B that beat the $24.25B consensus; the Defense, Space & Security segment swung to a $15M operating loss after a $280M VC-25B (Air Force One replacement) charge, though delivery is still targeted for 2028 (Boeing press release, Reuters). >- Free cash flow swung to a positive $631M from a $200M outflow a year earlier, and Boeing reaffirmed its full-year 2026 free-cash-flow guidance of $1–3B — its first positive year since 2023 — with consolidated debt down to $45.9B.
  • Total backlog hit a record $715B (including 6,200+ commercial airplanes valued at $597B) on 171 commercial deliveries (highest since 2018); shares rose ~4.9% as investors focused on cash-flow progress and 737/787 production ramp toward 47/mo (and eventually 57/mo).
about 21 hours ago
2 replies Ask a follow up

How is a company like Boeing evaluated?

about 10 hours ago
1 reply Ask a follow up

Great question. Let me walk you through how Boeing (BA) is evaluated, using its actual financials.Now let me also get Boeing's stock price to show market valuation context.Now let me show this as a table:Boeing is a unique case in industrial analysis — the company has been in a deep turnaround, which changes what metrics matter most. Here's how analysts evaluate it:


Boeing: A Framework for Evaluation

1. Profitability — Where the Story Starts

Boeing has posted negative operating income for five straight years. The key question isn't "what multiple to pay" — it's whether the company can return to structural profitability:

Year Revenue Gross Margin Operating Margin Net Income
25 $89.5B 4.8% -6.1% $2.2B
24 $66.5B -3.0% -16.3% -$11.8B
23 $77.8B 9.9% -1.0% -$2.2B
22 $66.6B 5.3% -5.3% -$4.9B
21 $62.3B 4.9% -4.6% -$4.2B

What analysts watch: - Gross margin trajectory — the core manufacturing health signal. The 2024 collapse to -3% (from 9.9%) reflected the 737 MAX production slowdown and strike. The recovery to +4.8% in 2025 is a tentative green shoot. - EBITDA — at $7.4B in 2025, this is the first meaningfully positive number in five years and the preferred metric for Boeing given heavy depreciation from its asset base. - Revenue ramping — Boeing hit $89.5B in 2025, approaching pre-2019 levels (~$101B in 2018), signaling demand isn't the problem.

2. Balance Sheet — Can They Survive Long Enough?

Boeing has been in negative equity for years, meaning liabilities exceed assets. This is the single biggest risk factor:

Year Total Assets Total Liabilities Equity LT Debt
25 $168B $163B +$5.5B $45.6B
24 $156B $160B -$3.9B $52.4B
23 $137B $154B -$17.2B $46.9B
22 $137B $153B -$15.9B $51.8B
21 $139B $153B -$15.0B $56.8B

2025 marks the first year since 2018 that Boeing has positive shareholder equity ($5.5B). Long-term debt has come down from $57B to $46B. Analysts track the debt-to-equity ratio and, more importantly, whether Boeing can continue servicing $45B+ in debt while generating enough operating cash.

3. Free Cash Flow — The Ultimate Scorecard

For an industrial turnaround, free cash flow is the single most important metric. It tells you whether the business can fund itself:

Year Operating CF CapEx Free Cash Flow
25 +$1.1B -$2.9B -$1.9B
24 -$12.1B -$2.3B -$14.4B
23 +$6.0B -$1.5B +$4.4B
22 +$3.5B -$1.2B +$2.3B
21 -$3.4B -$1.0B -$4.4B

2024 was catastrophic — the strike and production halt burned $14B in cash. 2025 is still FCF-negative at -$1.9B, but dramatically improved. The bull case rests on Boeing getting FCF sustainably positive and using it to pay down debt.

4. What Analysts Actually Track

In practice, Boeing evaluation centers on a few forward-looking drivers:

  • 737 MAX deliveries — the monthly production rate and delivery count. This is Boeing's cash engine. Every undelivered 737 ties up working capital.
  • 787 delivery pace — the widebody program's cash contribution, especially as international travel recovers.
  • Defense segment stability — BDS (Boeing Defense & Space) provides a counter-cyclical buffer but has had its own fixed-price contract overruns.
  • Net debt / EBITDA — once EBITDA is reliable, this leverage ratio becomes the primary valuation anchor.
  • EV/Sales on forward estimates — since earnings are unreliable, analysts often price Boeing on an enterprise-value-to-revenue basis, comparing to historical ranges and peers like Airbus.

5. Valuation Approach

Boeing is typically valued on a normalized earnings framework — analysts estimate what Boeing should earn at steady-state production (e.g., ~60+ 737s/month, ~10 787s/month) and discount that back. Common methods:

  • EV/EBITDA on 2-3 year forward estimates (Boeing historically traded 12-16x mid-cycle EBITDA)
  • FCF yield once cash flows turn reliably positive
  • Sum-of-the-parts — splitting Commercial Airplanes, Defense, and Services, each with its own multiple

The 2025 numbers — positive EBITDA of $7.4B, positive equity, and revenue approaching $90B — suggest the turnaround is taking shape, but the investment case still hinges on sustained execution: ramping production, generating free cash flow, and de-levering the balance sheet.

about 10 hours ago